A giant study (involving over 20,000 subjects over 8 years) looked at how four "healthy lifestyle habits" affected the risk of common diseases like heart disease and cancer. The four habits they chose to track?
1. Never smoking
2. Maintaining a BMI of 30 or lower (Calculate your BMI here.)
3. Engaging in at least 3 1/2 hours of physical activity per week
4. Eating a healthy diet, which was defined as one high in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains and low in meat. (Don't shoot the messenger!)
Less than 4% of the subjects had zero healthy behaviors. About twice as many (9%) could take credit for all four. Here's what's making headlines: The Four-Behavior Group had:
- 93% lower risk of diabetes
- 81% lower risk of heart attack
- 50% lower risk of stroke
- 36% lower risk of cancer
Of course, this study was purely observational, and there may be (and probably ARE) other unmeasured variables that came into play.
But, for what it's worth, the correlation between these four behaviors (especially in combination) and the risk of the four most common diseases is notable. Note that diabetes appears to be almost three times more "responsive" to lifestyle than cancer.
It's also interesting that of the four factors, diet had the weakest effect on risk. Avoiding obesity was the strongest factor, followed by never smoking, exercise, and (in last place) diet. Of course, that could have something to do with the way they defined "healthy" diet.
But it does underline something I've been saying a lot lately in comments and discussion on the blog. I suspect that obesity has a stronger impact on health than the details of dietary composition. In other words, it's an oversimplification to say that a certain diet (low-fat, low-carb, whatever) is healthier than another. Whatever diet (within reason) helps you achieve and maintain a healthy body weight has my vote. And, obviously, we're not all the same.
Just for kicks, how do Nutrition Data readers stack up against the German subjects in this study?
Source: Archives of Internal Medicine