"One point away from being diabetic"
Q. I was recently told by my doctor that I am 0.1 point away from becoming
a diabetic. Needless to say, I'm worried and I started changing my diet
and lifestyle to get me through this. But I am
getting really confused on what I can and cannot eat. I was watching
carbs, then learned I have to start watching the starch in foods, now
I’m reading about eGL and have no idea what to eat.
Question #1: Can you tell me how my body processes food and turns it into sugar? I
mean: if I eat something with 2g of sugar, 15 carbs and with an eGL of 5, what am I actually eating in a sugar count?
Question #2: Do I really need to worry this much or just avoid junk food, fast food, potatoes, rice, grain products, start getting some exercise to loose weight and call it a day?
A. I'm guessing that the number your doctor is referring to is your fasting glucose level. This test measures the amount of glucose in the blood after you've gone 8 to 12 hours without eating anything and it's commonly used to screen for diabetes. The cutoff for declaring someone diabetic (often around 110 mg/dL) is abitrary, of course. Obviously, if your blood glucose is 109.9, you are no more or less diabetic than if it were 110.1. The thing is that it sure got your attention. And if being "one point away from diabetic" motivates you to take action, all the better!
I can understand why you feel overwhelmed. When all the terms and concepts are brand new, it can be confusing. As long-time readers of this blog will tell you, learning about diet and nutrition can be a life-long pursuit. In the meantime, let me see if I can clarify and simplify things a bit for you. Of course, this is just the big-picture view, but it sounds as if that's what you could use most right now.
Type 2 Diabetes: The Big Picture
Type 2 diabetics and pre-diabetics are well-advised to eat a "low-glycemic diet." That simply means that you choose foods--and portion sizes!--that prevent large spikes in your blood sugar levels. This not only helps prevent the progression of the disease but can actually help you get back to a non-diabetic state-especially when accompanied by needed weight loss.
When you're trying to eat a low-glycemic diet, you want to consider both the quality and quantity of the carbohydrates you choose. Counting the number of grams of carbohydrates in your meals is simply a way to manage quantity. Think of it as a budget: You have a certain number of grams of carbohydrates to "spend" and you count to ensure that you don't go over your budget.
You could stop right there. Many diabetics do. But a more sophisticated approach is to pay attention to the quality of carbohydrates as well as the quantity.
The quality issue refers to how fast those carbohydrates are converted into blood sugar. Carbohydrates break down into three basic categories: starches, sugars, and fiber. Many carbohydrate foods will be a combination of all three. Foods containing more sugar will cause a higher and faster rise in blood sugar than foods that are high in fiber. (Starches are somewhere in between.)
For best results, you want to spend your carbohydrate budget on foods that are higher in fiber and lower in sugar. One way to do this is to use the estimated Glycemic Load as a tool. Instead of counting carbs, you could budget your meals according to their glycemic load. In this way, you'd be taking into account both the quality and quantity of the carbohydrates in your diet.
Think of it like this: Counting carbohydrates is like sticking to your budget of $50 for a new sweater. Counting eGL is like shopping for the best quality sweater you can find for that amount of money.
Type 2 Diabetes: The Close Up View
I encourage you to explore our Type 2 Diabetes Resource Center for more tools and information that can help you make sense of all of this and start putting it into action. In the meantime, let me briefly address your questions:
What should you count?
Both starches and sugars are broken down into glucose and absorbed into the bloodstream. The difference is that sugars are absorbed more rapidly than starches and fiber slows down the absorption of both.
For your hypothetical food containing 15g of carbs, 2g of sugar, and with an eGL of 5, you ask how or what you should count. You can choose to count carbs, and/or sugar, and/or eGL.
For example, you could set yourself a budget of 200g of carb a day. In that case, this food would count for 15. In addition, you could limit yourself to 50g of sugar a day. In that case, this food would count for 2. Or, you could have set a daily target of 75 for your eGL. In that case, this food would count for 5.
That's a lot of accounting! If you have the energy to pay that kind of attention to your diet, more power to you. But it may not be necessary, which brings me to your second question:
The Quick and Dirty Option
Do you really need to worry this much? I think there's a lot to be said for the common sense approach you've outlined: avoiding junk food and sweets (don't forget sweetened bverages), limiting your intake of breads, rice, and pasta, getting regular exercise and losing any excess weight. If you did all that, I think you'll be very pleasantly surprised at your next check up.
An Eye-opening Experiment
A few days of measuring and counting carbs or sugar, or looking up the eGL of foods can be extremely illuminating without having to be a life-long practice. You'll quickly see where the excess carbohydrates are coming from and learn how to estimate appropriate portion sizes.
Read More
Sugars and carbs and GI, oh my!
I'm diabetic: Where do I begin?
The Type 2 Diabetes Resource Center
Browse the headlines and highlights from the NutritionData.com Blog right from your inbox! Sign up for our free e-letter (it comes out twice a month) and we’ll keep you in the loop! View the archive.
Posted by: elninotheblog | Dec 16, 2009 5:43:55 PM
AND ANOTHER THING - it is not so much about limiting as it is DISPLACING. DISPLACE THE FILLER FOOD! Potatoes, corn, wheat, beans, sugar drinks should be eliminated fr at least a period of time. THEN INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF GOOD FOOD THAT YOU EAT! Green veggies of all kinds, fruit of all kinds, meat, eggs, fish, nuts, WATER, and there is not enough fat in any of these foods to cause harm to anyone so you need not worry about it. I have personally lost 35 pounds of BODY FAT AND KEPT IT OFF BY EATING A GREATER AMOUNT OF NATURAL FOOD AND SAVING THE POTATOES AND CORN AND BREAD, ETC. FOR ONE OR TWO MEALS A MONTH.
Read about real food at http://www.elninotheband.com
I AM NOT SELLING ANYTHING btw.
Posted by: elninotheblog | Dec 16, 2009 5:21:07 PM
The really sick thing is the doctors and nurses keep telling people to eat this crap "Both starches and sugars are broken down into glucose... and fiber slows down the absorption of both." Since a rapid rise in blood sugar happens to all people that eat this food, WHY do you keep telling them its ok to eat it? The M.O. of the medical community is to prescribe something - about 30 years ago they started telling everyone to eat fiber and now we have an epidemic of osteo-whatever (there is also a a 'pre condition for osteoporosis')because eating so much grains causes slower calcium absorption too! Thanks Doc! and thanks to Sally Fields for proving that just because you are seemingly fit doesn't mean you are unaffected by this stupidity.
Posted by: elninotheblog | Dec 16, 2009 5:07:19 PM
ok here we go again - This is really my main peeve when it comes to food - you have type 2 diabetes but you were not born with it - there is nothing wrong with your genes - the problem is the filler foods that you eat in your day-to-day. The reason they give you all this information about carbs and glycemic index and all is because they dont have the insight to tell you the NO ONE SHOULD BE EATING WHEAT, CORN, BEANS,(or any milled grain or boiled legume) OR REFINED SUGARS, ON A REGULAR BASIS. NO ONE! if you want to fix your body all you need to do is eliminate these things from your diet and your blood sugar will stabilize. I have seen it happen with many friends and family - sadly many of them also go back to those foods out of habit and their bodies fall into disrepair again. And all because 80 percent of the floor space at you supermarket is dedicated to products made entirely from or containing these substances + preservative compounds + other chemicals that provide mouthfeel + high level of salt! If you continue to eat these foods on a daily basis (multiple times per day for most of the world) YOU WILL GET OLD AND SICK. Read about real food at http://www.elninotheband.com
I AM NOT SELLING ANYTHING btw. Its just the information that you need not a meal replacement or magic pils or anything.
Posted by: Tom Johnson | Dec 15, 2009 11:49:25 AM
I am surprised that the #1 program in America for Type II Diabetes has not been brought up.It is a powerful weight loss program for those who need to lose weight and maintenance program for those who are at their ideal weight.You eat a meal replacement every 2-3 hours to keep blood levels consistent and one meal you cook yourself that includes 5-7 ounces of lean meat, fish or poultry and 3 servings of low glycemic vegetables. It is like mega nutrition fast food. No counting anything. It is based upon complete-nutrition,low glycemic meal-replacements. It has been around as a doctor prescribed program for about 20 years and is now available through a network of health coaches to the public. It has been studied and is utilized by Johns Hopkins weight management clinic. People lose weight quickly and keep it off - many get off meds completely (like me). It out-performs ADA's food based recommended diet. Check out http://leanertoday.tsfl.com
Posted by: Craig B. | Dec 14, 2009 10:06:26 PM
Speaking of "quality" of food, it's important to get the proper nutrition out of your food. Most packaged products are woefully inadequate in this regard. Part of the cause of insulin resistance is an undernourished cell wall. In my case, I was potassium deficient. When I switched from packaged food products to more raw, natural fruits and vegetables with their naturally high nutrient to Calorie ratio, my blood sugar plunged to sub normal for a week. Since then, it has leveled off. I quit taking Metformin two years ago and have been fine ever since.
Posted by: Type1 | Dec 14, 2009 5:04:03 PM
To JavaFueled
Can you get too much protein? The answer is that if you eat a lot at one time and it varies for each person by size and weight the protein you body does not need at that time is converted into Blood Glucose. I am a 50 year old woman weighing around 140 if I eat more than about 50 grams of protein I have to add a small amount to my carb calculation. The best way to see what it does to you is eat a large steak with out anything else and check your BG before you eat and then 1 hour, 2 hours and 3 hours after you eat.
Also you might want to note that adding good fats to any meal will slow down the carb absorption rate helping to keep from spiking the BG. So putting avacado on your sandwich slows down how fast you process the bread.
Posted by: DC in Alaska | Dec 14, 2009 4:41:51 PM
I was diagnosed with Insulin Resistance (pre-diabetic) with a fasting glucose of 108 and A1C of 5.6. I'm an overweight 63YO with extensive family history of skinny active Type 2 diabetics.
I followed the diet in ‘The Insulin-resistance Diet – Cheryle R. Hart, MD & Mary Kay Grossman, RD’. I am eating no more than 30 carbs per meal or within 2 hours; and having at least half as many protein grams as carbs. I'm having a minimum of 130 carbs/day, but not much more, as needed for proper brain functioning and am eating 1200-1300 calories per day.
My fasting glucose went from 108 to 92 in only 23 days of the above diet!!! And I lost weight easily!
I'm looking forward to my next A1C test 3 months from now and expect to continue to loose about 1 pound/week.
I'm converted to the 30-carbs-per-meal-and-in-2-hours club. Best of all - I have lots of energy and am mentally alert all day.
.
Posted by: Haggus | Dec 14, 2009 4:19:57 PM
A budget of 200g carbs per day?!? With all due respect Ms. Reinagel, that will guarantee that your emailer will develop full blown diabetes.
If your emailer thinks an a1c of 6% is 'good control' then by all means they should go to the ADA for great advice on how to keep it elevated.
If the emailer wants a shot at the 5% a1c club, at the very least, google Blood Sugar 101.
Oh, two years I ago I sported a a1c of 6.8% and a OGTT of 6.9mmol/l. Today, I'm sitting at 4.8% fully ignoring the CDA and ADA.
Monica's Response: It's certainly possible to set a lower limit for total but it may not be necessary, especially if one is also paying attention to the quality of the carbohydrates. For someone consuming 2400 calories a day, 200 g of carbs would equal just 33% of total calories (quite a bit lower than the ADA recommends!)
And, by the way, the latest research suggests that lower a1c levels don't necessarily translate into better outcomes.
My goals for a diabetic or pre-diabetic client (or anyone for that matter) would be 1) to achieve and maintain a healthy body weight and 2) maintain healthy blood sugar levels without the use of pharmaceutical drugs. I ASSURE you that that is more than possible on 200g of carbs a day.
Posted by: Kay | Dec 14, 2009 4:15:06 PM
I just had a blood test done and my glucose was 103. I am very concerned about this because I have been dieting since January 2009 and have lost 38 lbs. It was 99 back in July.
I thought when you lost weight it comes down. My doctor has not called me yet but would likes to hear opinions and advice on this matter.
Thanks, Kay
PS This was a 10 to 12 hours fasting test.
Posted by: javafueled | Dec 14, 2009 3:55:44 PM
I was also recently told I am .1 points away from being a diabetic, but because of my HbA1C (6.4), not my fasting glucose (91). I am a regular runner and actually a little bit underweight. I have cut back on carbs considerably,following a low GL diet. The unintended side affect was losing a couple lbs. I am hoping to get an improved HbA1C result and avoid medication. My question: Can a person get too much protein? I find that I am eating lots of nuts, poultry, fish and eggs (1 egg plus extra whites) to make up for the loss of calories I used to get from carbohydrates.
Posted by: samiamiami | Dec 5, 2009 9:30:48 AM
To the original person who is one point away from being diabetic . . . Monica's response is (in my opinion) exactly correct.
I was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes earlier this year, and I have spent 5 months getting things under control. I've lost 40 pounds; I exercise most days, and I eat healthy a low glycemic diet. My A1C numbers (blood glucose 2-3 month averages) have come down from 10+ to 5.4, which is pretty much that of a non-diabetic. (I still have diabetes--I just have it under control.) Please do follow Monica's advice, along with that from your doctor. And please do follow the links provided by Monica. I've used the tools here at ND quite a bit during my path to healthier eating.
Also, as another resource for you, I can recommend you to the American Diabetes Association's web site user forums. I'm a regular poster and reader there, along with many other smart diabetics who offer great support and advice. (And no, I'm not affiliated with the ADA in any way.) So I invite you to post more questions on the ADA forums; we're glad to offer our own opinions. :)
Take care,
Sam
Posted by: Monica Reinagel | Dec 1, 2009 8:38:28 AM
@PJ, you can read more about the formula used to derive the eGL here: http://www.nutritiondata.com/help/estimated-glycemic-load. But the simplest thing is probably to use our tracking and recipe analysis tools, which will calculate the eGL of your meals and recipes for you. You can also look up the eGL of individual foods right here. If you have a food that's not in our database, you can even enter it in using our custom entry tool (http://nutritiondata.com/tools/data-entry) and we will calculate an eGL for that!
Posted by: PJ | Nov 30, 2009 8:28:40 PM
Monica, I am a Type 2 diabetic, taking both fast and slow acting insulin, along with Metformin. My last A1C was 6.2, so I am in pretty good control but I would like to learn more about the glycemic load that you mentioned in your article so that I can control things even better. Too often my blood gloucose reading 2 hours after a meal will show increases of 60 to 100, in spite of the fast acting insulin, but by 3 hours after eating the reading will often be right about the same as before eating. By 4 hours, if I have not been able to grab a snack, my reading is often in the range of 50-60 and I have to get a quick dose of gloucose so that I won't pass out. Because of problems with my spine and osteoporosis I have a difficult time walking without aids, so my exercise is quite limited.
I do most of my cooking "from scratch", trying to estimate the values of each of the components, like protein, carbs, fiber, and so on based on adding up all of the numbers for each of the components in each category then dividing the totals by the number of servings.
None of my reference books mention glycemic loads or index. Might there be any formulae that I can add to my current calculations to come up with the glycemic load?
Posted by: Joseph Gentzel | Nov 30, 2009 4:00:03 PM
Beneficial effects of exercise from British Journal of Sports Medicine. See URL for abstract:
http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/early/2009/09/29/bjsm.2009.065557.abstract
That plus a diet that is a better ratio (at least 4-1) of Omega 6 fatty acids as contrasted to Omega 3 fatty acids will aid tghe management of diabets as much as anything available. The diet is most important.






