Wine and Heart Health
Here we go again. Another new study condones moderate wine intake for heart disease. Personally, as a nutritionist I hate these studies. Maybe for those that really to have very modest intake of wine it may be helpful, but honestly, we should be promoting studies on the numerous health benefits of fruits, vegetables, and whole grain foods which are much more supportive to our over all health and weight management. Wine still provides empty calories at about 100 calories for four or five ounces, which isn’t that much. A person could eat a few small pieces of fresh fruit or four servings of vegetables and obtain more numerous health benefits for the same amount of calories.
And to be honest very few people I know actually consume "moderate" amounts of wine, the quantity I mentioned above (men get double the amount). Too much wine can be addictive, elevate triglycerides, contribute to abnormal heart rhythms and raise breast cancer in women. Let's focus on other basic lifestyle behaviors instead to improve cardiovascular function like controlling cholesterol, blood pressure, and weight. Let's exercise regularly, quit smoking, and eat out less at fast food restaurants. Not only only do these practices improve our heart health they improve over all health and well-being in general!
Posted by: Ammy | Dec 17, 2008 6:28:12 AM
wine is good for heart disease because fruit is doing major part in wine...
http://blog.internationaldrugmart.com/
Posted by: david | Sep 23, 2008 12:45:47 AM
No Elaine you were were right on. In truth there is no safe (or beneficial)limit for alcohol. Benefits found are by researchers anxious to justify their lifestyles.... Alcohol as any honest chemist will tell you is a poison...diluted it just kills or maims a little more slowly... These studies are wasteful and supported by vested interests - researcher lifestyle habits and hooch sellers. Besides cigarettes it is society's legitimised drug. That's the honest, if austere, truth of the matter.
So great blog - keep it up.
Posted by: Susan Tomasini | Sep 22, 2008 4:13:17 PM
i am a recuperated alcoholic... what goes un noticed that we justify drinking because it is good for the heart... there are other alternatives to reducing stress, like optimum nutrition in whole foods, sunshine and time outdoors, friends, painting, etc etc.
i always shudder at the fact that ANYONE can become an alcoholic, given time and alcohol...
empty calories and altered consciousness are not conducive to good health.
Posted by: Elaine Murphy | Sep 22, 2008 12:30:16 PM
I guess I must have come on a little strong about resenting studies on any health benefits derived from alcohol. It's probably because I come from a family of alcoholism and I have experienced first hand the horrible affects it can have on people. And, as I have said before, there are numerous healthier ways (and foods) to benefit heart health other than condoning something that could become problematic.
Posted by: Mitchell | Sep 22, 2008 11:37:14 AM
I'm a little surprised to see you 'hate' in a professional context. Especially when you seem to be criticizing a lifestyle choice as much as anything. Yes, alcohol abuse is a terrible thing but that's not what's being discussed. And if there is some health benefit, then I would say the calories are not empty.
Posted by: Elaine Murphy | Sep 19, 2008 1:56:54 PM
Hi Suzanne,
I actually do not equate a cigarette with drinking a moderate amount of wine. I just feel there are better ways to promote a healthy heart. You may want to reread my blog.
Posted by: Steve Parker, M.d. | Sep 13, 2008 2:01:38 AM
Thanks for the reference, Elaine. I missed that study when it came out, or didn't comprehend the implications.
I have to say it looks like a reasonable, reliable study.
The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities data showed that middle-aged people who started moderate alcohol consumption had a 38% lower risk of developing cardiovascular disease compared to those who were not drinkers at the start of the study and who remained nondrinkers.
Again comparing the two groups, there was no difference in overall mortality (death rates).
Physicians, being well-aware of the ravages of alcohol abuse, have always been reluctant to recommend people start drinking alcohol for it's apparent health benefits.
Anyone interested in details of the study and my formal analysis can see them at my blog:
http://advancedmediterraneandiet.com/blog/?p=69
-Steve
Posted by: suzanne brown | Sep 11, 2008 12:39:26 PM
it's perplexing that you, a health care professional, would equate a glass of wine with a cigarette.
drinking in excess is physically and emotionally unhealthy, but since when is drinking in moderation considered a "bad habit," irrespective of whether it lowers one's risk for cardiovascular disease?
Posted by: Elaine Murphy | Sep 10, 2008 12:05:42 PM
Hi Dr. Parker, the study was from the Medical University of South Carolina's Department of Family Medicine, http://www.news-medical.net/?id=36018
Let us know your final thoughts! And, yes I would feel a lot better about suggesting grape juice rather than alcohol!
Posted by: Steve Parker, M.D. | Sep 9, 2008 8:10:50 PM
Hi, Elaine.
To which recent study do you refer?
Back in April I blogged about the potential adverse effects of alcohol:
http://advancedmediterraneandiet.com/blog/?p=31
I know researchers are trying to figure out if grape juice has the health benefits associated with wine. Wouldn't that be great?! I'm not sure if we have results yet.
-Steve
Posted by: Kate | Sep 9, 2008 4:39:25 PM
Amen. As a person who chooses not to drink, I find it amazing that so much time is spent trying to find out how much of a bad habit we can get away with and it's still 'good' for us! I imagine one cigarette is okay too...wonder who'll fund that study? I agree that for 100 calories (or the typical 500 that people I know consume)I'd rather find something with macronutrients that "help" me, not just 'don't hurt' me.






